Why indifference is the default — and how to turn it into insight.
As founders, we imagine sleek UX, seamless flows, and delightful onboarding.
But our first MVP? It’s rarely that.
Buttons aren’t where they should be.
Features break halfway.
Users are confused.
You think, “They’ll figure it out.”
They think, “What am I supposed to do here?”
Let’s be honest:
The chance that a user is satisfied with your MVP is basically 0%.
And that’s not a problem — it’s the point.
We love hearing how Airbnb, Dropbox, and Facebook started with an MVP.
But here’s what you don’t hear:
- Airbnb had zero bookings for months
- Dropbox showed only a concept video
- Facebook launched in a single campus with a basic UI
We forget that their MVPs weren’t successes — they were just starts.
When people say, “their MVP worked,” what they mean is:
“One step in a much longer story ended up successful.”
But for most of us, the MVP gets:
- Ignored
- Criticized
- Forgotten
Your earliest users aren’t early adopters — they’re early critics.
Only founders who push through that wall get to build something real.
Your MVP isn’t a product.
It’s an experiment.
You’re not launching to win.
You’re launching to ask:
“Does anyone care?”
“Was our hypothesis right?”
Silence or rejection is not failure — it’s feedback.
The only real failure?
No response at all.
1. They are busy
Your MVP is your everything.
To them? It’s just another random link.
Even signing up is generous.
2. They’re seeing your guess, not your product.
You built your MVP on a hypothesis.
If the hypothesis is wrong, the reaction is:
“What is this?”
“Why would I use it?”
That’s not rejection. That’s data.
3. Satisfaction is impossible by design.
An MVP is incomplete by nature.
Confusion, bugs, and questions are expected.
If your MVP feels like a rough prototype — good.
That means you’re ready to learn.
Waiting is not a strategy.
Action is.
Step 1: Identify Responders (even weak ones)
Look for:
Users who signed up but never came back
Users who clicked one thing, then left
Users who lingered on your FAQ
Clear drop-off points in your flow
These are not silent users. These are incomplete signals.
Step 2: Reach Out — Aggressively, Kindly
Priority:
📞 Call > 📧 Email > 💬 DM
Sample script:
“Hi [Name], we’re building something new and would really value your feedback.
Just 5–10 minutes. What confused you? What did you expect instead?”
Or:
“Thanks for signing up! We know it’s far from perfect — would love even a one-sentence reaction.”
Step 3: Turn Complaints into Roadmaps
Generic:
“It’s okay, I guess…” — Useless.
Useful:
“I didn’t know where to click.”
“Felt too complicated.”
“I already use X for this.”
These are gold. Criticism isn’t rejection — it’s direction.
Tactic 1: Automated Interview Triggers
If inactive for 3 days, send survey
Incentivize with a $5 gift card
One-click feedback form via email
Tactic 2: High-Touch User Conversations
Invite select users to Zoom feedback sessions
Document everything in Notion
Mention users by name in release notes (with permission)
Tactic 3: Publish “Feature Failures”
Write a blog post:
“Why we built [X], why no one used it, and what we learned.”
These build founder trust and attract like-minded builders.
Your MVP doesn’t need to satisfy — it needs to provoke.
Even a single “I didn’t get it” can shape your next 6 months.
The probability that your MVP satisfies users is near 0%.
But the probability that one critical user will guide you to a better product?
That’s close to 100%.